... and no one's there to read it, does it still make a sound?
Okay, maybe that doesn't work. But you know what I mean.
Yes - oh yes - this is the introspective post of destiny. You saw it coming from a mile away, didn't you? You clever thing!
(Editor's note: this post has been written and deleted and written and deleted and then prematurely posted - apologies if you read that [expletive] - and then written and deleted and, finally written and posted. There's no going back now, dear readers.)
When we were younger, my sister was way cooler than I was. Sarah was a
queen bee in high school, and while she and I were and are close, we wouldn't have traveled in the same circles. I didn't mind this, for the most part, but there was one thing about her that I really envied: whenever I had to stay at home instead of going out with my friends I always felt like I was missing out, whereas I always got the feeling that when Sarah was stuck with the family she felt that her friends were missing out.
I suppose you could say that this indicated that I lacked self-esteem or self-confidence, but I really didn't. I've always sort of thought I was the cat's pajamas. I still do, actually.
But I think that what worried me then - and what worries me now in the blogging world - is that no one else knows. I'm worried that I'm just writing for me, that I'm not reaching anyone, that no one's listening.
And then that worry is multiplied exponentially because the need to write for others beyond myself isn't selfless in this case - it's selfish. And who wants to be selfish? Not this pair of feline nightwear, no sir.
I don’t know what this new blog will be – a creative and literary exercise more than anything else, possibly. But as much as I may be blogging for myself, I am also blogging for you. I want to share myself with you, though you may be far away; I want you to be part of this new life that I am making regardless of your personal geography.
So this leads me to ask: why isn't it enough to blog for myself? Why do I have to blog for you? You're not asking for my words. (Okay, chers grandparents, maybe you are. And you, Christian. But you're very special exceptions!) Sometimes I think that there are so many tens of thousands - maybe hundreds of thousands - of blogs out there and I wonder if mine makes a dent.
But then I get frustrated with myself because it shouldn't matter if my blog is read as long as I get something out of writing it. Right? But it does matter.
Which brings us back to my story about Sarah. I shouldn't think that I'm missing out if my blog isn't being read. I should think that my readers, non-existent or otherwise, are the ones missing out.
Let's go back a bit further to the original question: if a blog falls in the forest and no one's there to read it, does it still make a sound?
Nicole on Hollaback Health - by the way, many thanks to the inimitable Marie for introducing me to this site - wrote a post on the psychology behind blogging. I definitely relate to the "identity" section. Nicole asks, "Do you feel satisfaction from blogging? What need are you satisfying?"
I would say that I absolutely do feel satisfaction from blogging. When I blog, I satisfy my need to have a creative outlet, as I indicated in that first blog post. But blogging also satisfies my need to have a voice. No, more than that - it satisfies my need to be heard.
But what happens if I'm not being heard? Is blogging still satisfying?
What's the point in having a voice if no one listens to it?
I don't know. I really don't know.
I'm not going to stop blogging, don't worry. I think my need to have a voice and my need to be heard will ensure that I blog away with entrepreneurial zeal. But this all is definitely raising some serious questions for me.
Yargh.
(Here endeth the introspective post of destiny.)